i know anyone who believes in evolution is going to say that there is no 'if' about it.
however.... if man evolved over hundreds of thousands of years ago, why were there only about 200-300 million people alive 2,000 years ago?
surely there'd have been many billions by then?.
I wasn't throwing out bait, I posted kent Hovinds video and you wanted me to comment
on it I said I didnt want to. I just wanted the curious to watch with out the distractions.
I'd say the record in black and white on this thread shows you baited me.
Page 7 both you and Cofty baited me. I just posted a video.
i know anyone who believes in evolution is going to say that there is no 'if' about it.
however.... if man evolved over hundreds of thousands of years ago, why were there only about 200-300 million people alive 2,000 years ago?
surely there'd have been many billions by then?.
If we had no religious texts (written by ancient civilisations who knew very little) we would never look at the evidence and suggest a young earth:
When was the last time we had a magnetic flip? The magnetic compass has been in use since about 200 B.C. Since then it's resolutely pointed North. When molten rock cools magnetite nodules record the magnetic orientation of the earth's field. The number of recorded flips measured by bands of alternating N/S magnetite alignment is in the hundreds. Had the earth's magnetic field flipped every decade or so this would fit the young earth model. We know that this isn't the case and the magnetic flips seems a very slow process. The evidence is simple, the earth is ancient.
Well they say we are product of our environment and that is our history that we have a young earth.
The ancient civilizations built the pyramids and had complex math, algebra and knew about the stars and
could navigate the oceans. They had batteries, calculators and plumbing. They had calendars and clocks with
minutes, copper tools and bronze weapons, bricks, methods of writing, wheeled vehicles. They used ramps
and levers and rope trusses.
i know anyone who believes in evolution is going to say that there is no 'if' about it.
however.... if man evolved over hundreds of thousands of years ago, why were there only about 200-300 million people alive 2,000 years ago?
surely there'd have been many billions by then?.
I know anyone who believes in evolution is going to say that there is no 'if' about it. However...
If man evolved over hundreds of thousands of years ago, why were there only about 200-300 million people alive 2,000 years ago? Surely there'd have been many billions by then?
The above is the original topic by the person who started the thread.
I was trying to point out to him through Hovinds many videos that we did not evolve and we have not been here hundreds of
thousands of years. That would be an answer to his question.
Regarding your post to me
James brown
It appears that noone really cares that you don't believe the dating methods, that you do believe in a bible creator god, along w sitchens gods. Would you like me to start a thread to find out if there is ANYONE who cares what you believe, no matter how wacky it is?
S
The relevancy in not believing dating methods is pertinent to the original post. It's called a topic.
Remarkably it seems like a number of people here are very upset about me not believing in dating methods.
I would say multiple pairs of underwear are bunched up in knots over this thread.
i know anyone who believes in evolution is going to say that there is no 'if' about it.
however.... if man evolved over hundreds of thousands of years ago, why were there only about 200-300 million people alive 2,000 years ago?
surely there'd have been many billions by then?.
I didn't come here to debate Sitchin. I am just pointing out there are other explanations.
I came here to point out that radiometric dating doesn't work
and I can see no one satisfactorily rebutting me.
So I am satisfied.
i know anyone who believes in evolution is going to say that there is no 'if' about it.
however.... if man evolved over hundreds of thousands of years ago, why were there only about 200-300 million people alive 2,000 years ago?
surely there'd have been many billions by then?.
I have read all of Sitchens books, You have spent 5 minutes reading a website discrediting him.
We cant even have a discussion.
i know anyone who believes in evolution is going to say that there is no 'if' about it.
however.... if man evolved over hundreds of thousands of years ago, why were there only about 200-300 million people alive 2,000 years ago?
surely there'd have been many billions by then?.
Cofty: If I was not a Christian at all. There are other evidences that would give Genesis validity.
There are evidences that earth was visited by aliens and the aliens were as Gods
and the aliens combined their genes with the genes of the living creatures on earth
and made Adam and Eve.
The evidence is compiled in the 10 or so books of Zechariah Sitchin. Also Michael Tillingers
Slave Species of God and Von Danikens "Chariots of the Gods"
i know anyone who believes in evolution is going to say that there is no 'if' about it.
however.... if man evolved over hundreds of thousands of years ago, why were there only about 200-300 million people alive 2,000 years ago?
surely there'd have been many billions by then?.
Hello Randy: I think it is good spending time reading to your children.
When they are grown they will remember the time and attention you gave them
and you will be rewarded for it.
An attitude of gratitude of giving thanks for what one has goes along way.
They say your attitude determines your altitude.
Praying and thinking upon is pretty synonymous in my brain.
I can see the idea that we are made of stardust. I don't believe they have ever found
anything in space that is not here on earth.
At the same time they haven't done much exploration of space.
James Brown
i think we all know that shariah law is basically mohammads copy of the torah, with minor edits.
slavery, womens inequality, anti homosexuality are obviously written in the same spirit.
so believers why dont you go live in saudi arabia if yo u believe gods law is perfect or at the last useful ?.
There are not many atheist in the world. That is why they don't show up in trends.
Atheistic countries like Russia and China they dont allow anarchy they squash dissent with the
firing squad or life in a distant gulag.
Russia is now getting away from atheism and accepting God more so than back in the 50's, 60's
and 70's.
"faith is not a possession of all people.
" that's what the scripture says.
i guess i'm one of those people.
In pschology they teach that when we are born are brains are empty.
Then life and our elders and ourselves start wiring our brains.
Now you are at an age where it is up to you to tweak, accept or change your brains wiring.
If you want what someone else has got do what someone else does.
If you want what a Christian does think and do like a Christian.
If you want what an atheist does think and do like an atheist.
For example read the bible and Christian literature.
Or Read Richard Dawkins, Christopher Hitchens, and secular humanistic literature.
There is no magic pill If you want Gods spirit in you you have to constantly ask for it and
cultivate it.
If you want a spirit of the world and atheism you have to ask and cultivate it.
The good atheist are on here 24/7 cultivating their atheistic spirit. You have to do the same thing
if you want Gods spirit.
If you don't stand for something, you will fall for anything.
i think we all know that shariah law is basically mohammads copy of the torah, with minor edits.
slavery, womens inequality, anti homosexuality are obviously written in the same spirit.
so believers why dont you go live in saudi arabia if yo u believe gods law is perfect or at the last useful ?.
Atheism is a religion of the rich and wealthy. The rich and wealthy don't spend much time in jail.
You have to be well off and have lots of time to even contemplate being an atheist.
Most hard working people are too busy to do all the thinking to become an atheist.
Most people are in jail because their wants are not being filled at least that is what they teach
in Florida. They teach people are in jail because they can not self actualize according
to Mazlows hiearcy of needs.
I don't know if that is true or not, it is man's philosophy taught in the public
education sytem and adopted by the Florida justice system for use in its jails.
Every year for 10 years that is what they taught me in my in service training.
The secular government, not the Christians, taught me that.
